These are only the tip of the iceberg amongst the vast array of unanswered questions related to God. Cosmological arguments were started at the time the questions of the universe were first asked. If this is so, then the faculty of knowing the truth, his intellect, must be also be finite.
How else could one account for the origin of the universe itself? What significance does the existence of God have upon mankind?
The only way its existence could be proven would be if it desired humankind to prove its existence. Thus Descartes concludes the only remaining option to be that this perception was innate in him.
From these premises, I believe that we have the grounds to speculate that the perceptions based on his finite faculties of knowledge hold the potential of having mistakes. There is a God and with these reasons I will prove that. If such God does exist, then where does this being come from?
Furthermore, he implies that the fact that the boundaries of will extending further than the finite intellect is the very source of human error. According to Descartes, this idea of a supremely intelligent and supremely powerful being, who created everything that exists, can not and does not come from within him who is imperfect.
Even as of today with all the modern technologies and the development of sciences, we still do not have a definitive answer to the question "does God exist? Yet, Descartes claims that God gave humans no faculty for making mistakes, and we are constituted as a mediator between God and nothingness.
For the sake of convenience, we shall borrow some theological ideas from Christianity, the Christian God, to exemplify our comparisons.
This argument is based on presumptions in other cosmological arguments. He also stated that the faculty of choosing, his will, is finite. Although Descartes embraces quite a grand statement on the issues of God, I felt that his beliefs were biased towards his own perception and lacked evidence in proving that God exists to the point beyond reasonable doubt.
Theology, cosmological, teleological and ontological arguments are all have ways to prove the existence of God. He begins this theory by mentioning that ideas of certain things which are outside of him have their own truth and natures.
Some scholars state certain biblical events can be proven to be false. These ontological arguments argue about what God is to where he is from. Must everything that Descartes perceives be true as long as it is clear and distinct? Thomas tells us that natural theology does not give us saving knowledge, because even if you know God exists does not mean you have salvation.
If this was to occur, it could be argued that it would be a case of God revealing itself to humans as opposed to humans proving its existence. These ideas were not fabricated by him, and they have not entered him through the sense experience. All of my arguments provided are philosophical theology or natural theology.
Why do believers and non-believers hold on to their beliefs as they do?
If such God does exist, then where does this being come from? Before we go any further, we must ponder upon several questions. There are two types of theology discussed in chapter nine of Kessler "Voices of Wisdom," revealed and natural theology.
At a later time I will mention and discuss the hypotheses that atheistic scientists have been advancing to account for the origin of the universe—they do not accept the assumption that one must postulate a transcendent cause—but in what follows I will restrict my comments to an older objection to the first-cause argument, an objection which may be given the label "What caused God?
Descartes views God in a similar way to St. Moreover, this perception did not originate from the experiences of the world, nor was this drawn from the senses. Atheists cannot use inaccuracies in holy books as proof that God does not exist, as it is possible that such a god exists who has never been mentioned in religious texts.
Though there are so many uncertainties as we have just mentioned, the existence of all other uncertainties in our world may explain why the existence of God is so real to many people. Anselm, the creator of the ontological argument, based his theory on that we cannot think of anything greater than God.
He argues first for the thesis that the universe had a beginning, the moment of the big bang. This view is known as theism. Cosmological arguments come in many varieties, such as the existence of the universe to God as its creator, cause, or explanation. Secondly, the existence of God explains the arguments regarding the efficient causality; as the world exhibits orderly causal sequences, something had to start it all up.The Existence of God.
The Existence of God Periodically someone will say to me, "I don't understand how anyone can be an atheist. The only way its existence could be proven would be if it desired humankind to prove its existence.
If this was to occur, it could be argued that it would be a case of God revealing itself to humans as opposed to humans proving its existence. Free Essays from Bartleby | Popular Arguments For The Existence Of God The Ontological Argument One of the most important attempts to demonstrate the.
Descartes proves the existence of God using an ontological argument, one aimed at understanding the existence, the essence, the being of God. Saint Anselm of Canterbury also makes the existence of God evident using the ontological proof.
Essay The Existence of God For centuries, the idea of God has been a part of man's history. Past and present, there has always been a different integration consisting of the believers and the non-believers of God.
The group of those who have "faith" in God tend to be related to one religion or another. On the other hand, the skeptics find the existence of God.
- The Existence of God In this essay I am going to explore and analyse arguments concerning the existence of God.
I will be investigating all the different beliefs about God from Christians including: 'Moral and Divine Command', 'Ontological', 'Cosmological' and the argument from design.Download